VIDEOS ——— Curchill-Cide —– Churchill Genocide —– British Genocide ——– British Colonial Terrorism in India

.

.

British  Genocide

in

India

.

.

.

Churchill-Cide

Churchill-Cide

Churchill-Cide

Churchill-Cide

Churchill-Cide

Churchill-Cide

.

.

.

Churchill  Genocide

in

India

.

.

.

.

British  Colonial  Terror

.

Churchill  Colonial  Terror

.

“Churchill  Lies”    &    “Churchill  Distortion” 

of 

British  Colonial  History

.

.

.

.

Racist,  Nazi  &  Fascist

British  Terrorist  Vampire  ( Empire )  in  India

.

.

.

.

Churchill-Cide  —–  Churchill  Genocide  —-  British  Genocide

.

British  General  Dyre’s  Brutal, 

Churchill-Cide  ( “Churchill  Genocide” )

at

“Amritsar  Garden  Massacre”  in  India

.

.

.

.

Churchill-Cide —– Churchill  Genocide  —-  British  Genocide

.

General  Dyre’s  Brutal, 

Churchill-Cide  ( “Churchill  Genocide” )

at

” Amritsar  Garden  Massacre”  in  India

.

.

.

.

Curchill-Cide —– Curchill  Genocide  —– British  Genocide

.

British  General  Dyre’s  Brutal, 

Churchill-Cide  ( “Churchill  Genocide” )

at

“Amritsar  Massacre  Garden”  in  India

.

.

.

.

India’s  First  War  of  Independence

against  the

British  Terrorists  &  Churchill  Terrorists

.

It  was  fought  by  the  Indian  Hero,  Mangal  Panday

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

British Genocide – British Nazis killed 50,000 Children in Canada between 1800 and 1900

.

.

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

.

.

.

.

British Genocide

.

British Genocide

.

British Genocide

.

British Genocide

.

British Genocide

.

.

.

.

.

Barbaric

British Chemical Experiments

upon

50,000 Children in Canada

.

.

.

.

.

Barbaric

Churchill Chemical Experiments

upon

50,000 Children in Canada

.

.

.

.

.

Churchill Genocide in Canada

.

Churchill Genocide in Canada

.

Churchill Genocide in Canada

.

Churchill Genocide in Canada

.

Churchill Genocide in Canada

.

.

.

.

.

British Nazis & Churchill Nazis

killed

50,000 Children

50,000 Children

50,000 Children

in Canada in Chemical Experiments

between 1800 & 1900

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

50,000 Dead Children

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

 

British Genocide – Churchill Genocide – British Queen’s Churchill Genocide of Mohawk Children in Canada

.

.

.

http://www.ITCCS.org

.

http://www.ExoPolitics.com

.

.

.

Alex Jones’ Channel – 1

.

.

.

.

Alex Jones’s Channel – 2

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Nazi Queen Elizabeth of Nazi Britain & her Nazi Father, both killed Millions in the British Colonies

.

.

.

Nazi Queen Elizabeth of Nazi Britain killed & Buried Mohawk Children in Canada

.

.

.

.

.

British Genocide in Canada

.

British Nazi Queen Killed Mohawk Children in Canada

.

.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/236302-Mass-genocide-of-Mohawk-children-by-UK-Queen-and-Vatican-uncovered-in-Canada

.

Alfred Lambremont Webre
Examiner.com
Sat, 8 Oct 2011

.

Brantford, ON, Canada – Mass graves of Mohawk children have been uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute, a residential school for Mohawk operated by the Church of England and the Vatican before its closure in 1970.

.

According to Rev. Kevin Annett, Secretary of the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (itccs.org), the Mohawk Institute was “set up by the Anglican Church of England in 1832 to imprison and destroy generations of Mohawk children. This very first Indian [First Nations] residential school in Canada lasted until 1970, and, like in most residential schools, more than half of the children imprisoned there never returned. Many of them are buried all around the school.”

.

Preliminary scanning by ground penetrating radar adjacent to the now closed main building Mohawk Institute has revealed that “between 15-20 feet of soil” was brought in and put over the mass graves just before the Mohawk Institute closed in 1970 in order to camouflage the mass graves of Mohawk Children and avoid prosecution for genocide and crimes against humanity under the Geneva Conventions, the International Criminal Court, and cooperating national courts.

.

International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (ITCCS.org) is expected to commence judicial proceedings starting in late October 2011 in Brussels, Belgium and Dublin, Ireland for child genocide crimes against humanity against defendants Elizabeth Windsor, head of state of Canada and head of the Church of England and Pope Joseph Ratzinger, both of whom knowingly participated in the planning and coverup of the child genocide, according to forensic evidence.

.

The Tribunal sessions were originally to have been held in London, U.K. However, The U.K. government has denied entrance to the Secretary and major jurists and staff of the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (ITCCS.org) without cause.

.

The discovery of the mass graves of Mohawk children, uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute comes on the heels of videotaped evidence by eyewitness William Coombes, who in Oct. 1964 witnessed Elizabeth Windsor, as Head of State of Canada and Head of the Church of England, visit an aboriginal school in Kamloops, British Columbia, choose 10 young aboriginal children, made them kiss her feet, and allegedly took them from the school for a picnic at a lake.

.

The 10 aboriginal children were never seen again. Mr. Coombes, who was to give evidence at the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (ITCCS.org) of Elizabeth Windsor’s child genocide, was murdered in Feb. 2011. Fortunately, Mr. Coombes’ testimony was videotaped before his death and is available for the Tribunal.

.

Rev. Kevin Annett states that instruments of torture such as a rack for torturing the Mohawk children in ritual torture have been found at the now closed Mohawk Institute. Eyewitnesses from the Mohawk community have stated they witnessed priests in red robes torturing children in ritual torture.

.

Rev. Annett made these revelations in an exclusive Oct. 7, 2011 interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre. In the interview, Rev. Annett acknowledges the close parallels between the Oct. 1964 personal child genocide and possible ritual killings of 10 aboriginal children by Elizabeth Windsor, Head of State of Canada and Head of the Church of England, and the child genocides occurring during the same period at the Mohawk Institute.

.

These parallels suggest that Elizabeth Windsor, as Head of State and Head of the Church of England was personally aware of, ordered, and participated in this systematic program of genocide and ritual torture and killings at Church of England residential schools operated by the Church of England and the Vatican.

.

In his interview, Rev. Annett stated that the mainstream Canadian media, as well as the government of Canada, are maintaining a coverup and media blackout of the discoveries of Mohawk child genocide at the Mohawk Institute.

.

.

.

Further Reading :

.

http://boards.dailymail.co.uk/news-board-moderated/10238000-mass-genocide-mohawk-children-alledged-uk-queen-vatican-kevin-annett-interviewed-alfred-webre.html

.

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1557522

.

http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1012783&page=2

.

http://itccs.org/

.

http://canadianawareness.org/2011/10/mass-genocide-of-mohawk-children-by-uk-queen-and-vatican-uncovered-in-canada/

.

Mass Genocide Of Mohawk Children By UK Queen And Vatican Uncovered In Canada

.

http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2011/10/mass-genocide-of-mohawk-children-by-uk.html

.

http://www.bobtuskin.com/2011/10/12/mass-genocide-of-mohawk-children-by-uk-queen-and-vatican-uncovered-in-canada/

.

http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/8862/Mass-graves-of-Mohawk-children-uncovered-at-Mohawk-Institute-a-school-operated-by-Church-of-England-the-Vatican.aspx

.

This last link shows communications to Theresa May from Bill Annett

http://www.molestedcatholics.com/index.php?id=864

.

.

.

.

.

.

Churchillcide – Churchill Genocide – Churchill Famine in India and Bangladesh in 1942

.

.

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

.

.

.

.

Churchill  Famine

in

India & Bangladesh

in 1942

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

We demand

Compensation for India

for the

Churchill Famine

of

Nazi Britain

in 1942 in which,

6 — 7  Million  Indians

6 — 7  Million  Indians

6 — 7  Million  Indians

6 — 7  Million  Indians

died of

Churchill Famine

&

&

&

&

&

&

We Demand

Compensation for Bangladesh

for the

Churchill Famine

of

Nazi Britain

in 1942 in which,

6 — 7  Million  Bangla  People

6 — 7  Million  Bangla  People

6 — 7  Million  Bangla  People

6 — 7  Million  Bangla  People

died of

Churchill Famine

.

.

.

.

.

.

Churchill’s Secret Wars

The British Empire & the Ravaging of India

during World War – II

.

.

By, Respectable & Honourable 

Madam Madhusree Mukerjee of India

Hardback

368 Pages

Basic Book Publishers

26 Aug, 2010

ISBN : 046 – 500 – 2013

.

.

www.Madhusree.com

.

.

.

.

Respectable & Honourable Madam

Madhusree Mukerjee of India

.

www.Madhusree.com

.

.

Respectable & Honourable  Madam, Miss Madhusree Mukerjee is an Indian writer, science journalist and a former physicist

Her new book, Churchill’s Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II uses meticulous research and new sources to relate how Winston Nazi Churchill and his Terrorist War Cabinet exhaustively used Indian resources to fight the Second World War, provoking famine and insurrection in the Eastern province of Bengal. The book is also a riveting account of the triumphant but tragic final stage of India’s freedom movement

.

.

.

.

.

Churchill-cide

.

Churchill-cide

.

Churchill-cide

.

Churchill-cide

.

Churchill-cide

.

= =

= =

= =

= =

.

Churchill’s Genocide

.

Churchill’s Genocide

.

Churchill’s Genocide

.

Churchill’s Genocide

.

Churchill’s Genocide

.

.

.

.

Churchill Nazi, Winston Churchill is to Blame for Churchill famine in Bangal (Contemporary Bangladesh) in India in 1942, which resulted in the death of around 6 – 7 Million Indians.  All these unfortunate Indians & Bangladeshis fell victims to the Churchill Famine of the Churchill Nazi, for which, Winston Churchill was NEVER prosecuted all his life

.

.

.

Churchill Nazi, Winston Churchill notoriously remarked that, “Since the Indians breed like Rabits, let some of them die.  They would only reproduce their fellow Dead, within just a few months”

.

.

.

These heartless & Genocidal minded remarks can only emanate from the mouth of a Committed, Confirmed & a Brutal Nazi, Fascist, Terrorist & War Criminal, which Winston Churchill, undoubtedly was

.

.

.

.

.

Winston Churchill

was

the Biggest

Nazi, Fascist, Terrorist

&

War Criminal

of the 20th Century,

because he

happily, willingly & brutally

happily, willingly & brutally

happily, willingly & brutally

happily, willingly & brutally

happily, willingly & brutally

massacred

&

killed

22  Millions

22  Millions

22  Millions

22  Millions

22  Millions

22  Millions

22  Millions

22  Millions

in the British Colonies

between

1899 & 1965

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

Book Review

.

Churchill’s Secret Wars

.

Churchill Famine in India & Bangladesh

.

.

.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Winston-Churchill-to-blame-for-Bengal-famine-Book/articleshow/6521955.cms

.

.

Times of India

20 Comments

.

.

NEW DELHI :

British prime minister Winston Churchill deliberately let millions of Indians starve to death, the author of a new book has claimed, alleging he was motivated in part by racial hatred. As many as three million people died in the Bengal famine of 1943 after Japan captured neighbouring Burma a major source of rice imports — and British colonial rulers in India stockpiled food for soldiers and war workers.

.

Panic-buying of rice sent prices soaring, and distribution channels were wrecked when officials confiscated or destroyed boats and bullock carts in Bengal to stop them falling into enemy hands if Japan invaded. Rice became scarce and, as worsening hunger spread through villages, Churchill repeatedly refused pleas for emergency food shipments.

.

Emaciated masses drifted into Kolkata, where eye-witnesses described men fighting over foul scraps and skeletal mothers dying in the streets as British and middle-class Indians ate large meals. The “man-made” famine has long been one of the darkest chapters of the British Raj, but now Madhusree Mukerjee says she has uncovered evidence that :

.

Churchill was directly responsible for the appalling sufferings

Churchill was directly responsible for the appalling sufferings

Churchill was directly responsible for the appalling sufferings

.

Her book, “Churchill’s Secret War”, quotes previously unused papers that disprove his claim that no ships could be spared from the war and that show him brushing aside increasingly desperate requests from British officials in India.

.

Analysis of World War II cabinet meetings, forgotten ministry records and personal archives show that full grain ships from Australia were passing India on their way to the Mediterranean region, where huge stockpiles were building up. “It wasn’t a question of Churchill being inept: sending relief to Bengal was raised repeatedly and he and his close associates thwarted every effort,” Mukerjee said.

.

.

.

___________________

.

.

.

.

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

.

.

.

.

Churchill Famine

in

India & Bangladesh

in 1942,

in which

Winston Churchill

killed

6 – 7 Million

Indians & Bangladeshis

with a 

total

total total

total total total

total total total total

total total total total total

total total total total total total

impunity

We hate Winston Nazi Churchill

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Churchill Nazi, Winston Churchill

Churchill Nazi, Winston Churchill

.

.

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

Churchill  Famine

.

.

.

Churchill Nazi, Winston Churchill Looted India & Killed 6 – 7 Million Indians during the artificial British Famine, which lasted for around 3 years i.e. 1942 – 1945

Winston Churchill & his Nazi Britain imposed thousands of such British Famines upon the whole world, during their Nazi & Terrorist British Colonial Era

.

.

.

.

.

Wanted

Dead  or  Alive

.

.

Have you seen this Churchill Nazi somewhere ?

If yes,

then report him to the Police

in

India & Bangladesh

immediately, immediately, immediately,

because he is

Wanted – Dead or Alive

Wanted – Dead or Alive

Wanted – Dead or Alive

Wanted – Dead or Alive

for his

Churchill Famine

Churchill Famine

Churchill Famine

Churchill Famine

in both these countries

.

.

.

.

.

.

Book Review

.

Churchill’s Secret Wars

.

Churchill Famine in India & Bangladesh, 1942

.

.

.

.

.

The Ugly Briton

By, Shashi Tharoor, Indian MP

Monday — 29-11-2010

.

.

.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2031992,00.html

.

.

.

” I  hate  Indians “

” I  hate  Indians “

” I  hate  Indians “

” They  are  Beastly  People

with  a

Beastly  Religion “

.

.

Churchill Nazi said to

Leopold Amery,

Minister for India

.

.

.

Few statesmen of the 20th century have reputations as outsize as Winston Churchill’s. And yet his assiduously self-promoted image as what the author Harold Evans called “the British Lionheart on the ramparts of civilization” rests primarily on his World War II rhetoric, rather than his actions as the head of a government that ruled the biggest empire the world has ever known. Madhusree Mukerjee’s new book, Churchill’s Secret War, reveals a side of Churchill largely ignored in the West and considerably tarnishes his heroic sheen.

.

In 1943, some 3 million brown-skinned subjects of the Raj died in the Bengal famine, one of history’s worst. Mukerjee delves into official documents and oral accounts of survivors to paint a horrifying portrait of how Churchill, as part of the Western war effort, ordered the diversion of food from starving Indians to already well-supplied British soldiers and stockpiles in Britain and elsewhere in Europe, including Greece and Yugoslavia. And he did so with a churlishness that cannot be excused on grounds of policy: Churchill’s only response to a telegram from the government in Delhi about people perishing in the famine was to ask why Gandhi hadn’t died yet. (See the top 10 weird government secrets.)

.

British imperialism had long justified itself with the pretense that it was conducted for the benefit of the governed. Churchill’s conduct in the summer and fall of 1943 gave the lie to this myth. “I hate Indians,” he told the Secretary of State for India, Leopold Amery. “They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.” The famine was their own fault, he declared at a war-cabinet meeting, for “breeding like rabbits.”

.

As Mukerjee’s accounts demonstrate, some of India’s grain was also exported to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to meet needs there, even though the island wasn’t experiencing the same hardship; Australian wheat sailed past Indian cities (where the bodies of those who had died of starvation littered the streets) to depots in the Mediterranean and the Balkans; and offers of American and Canadian food aid were turned down. India was not permitted to use its own sterling reserves, or indeed its own ships, to import food. And because the British government paid inflated prices in the open market to ensure supplies, grain became unaffordable for ordinary Indians. Lord Wavell, appointed Viceroy of India that fateful year, considered the Churchill government’s attitude to India “negligent, hostile and contemptuous.” (See pictures of the Red Cross during the war.)

.

Mukerjee’s prose is all the more devastating because she refuses to voice the outrage most readers will feel on reading her exhaustively researched, footnoted facts. The way in which Britain’s wartime financial arrangements and requisitioning of Indian supplies laid the ground for famine; the exchanges between the essentially decent Amery and the bumptious Churchill; the racism of Churchill’s odious aide, paymaster general Lord Cherwell, who denied India famine relief and recommended most of the logistical decisions that were to cost so many lives — all are described in a compelling narrative.

.

Churchill said that history would judge him kindly because he intended to write it himself. The self-serving but elegant volumes he authored on the war led the Nobel Committee, unable in all conscience to bestow him an award for peace, to give him, astonishingly, the Nobel Prize for Literature — an unwitting tribute to the fictional qualities inherent in Churchill’s self-justifying embellishments. Mukerjee’s book depicts a truth more awful than any fiction.

.

Mr. Tharoor is an Intellectual & Academic and he intensley hates Churchill Nazi (Winston Churchill), the same way as we (All Irish, French, Swiss & Argentinian Moderators of this Blog, Politics-5) do. Mr. Tharoor was the Deputy Secretary General of United Nations in the past and now, he is a Member of Parliament in India.

He is the author of  —– Nehru : The Invention of India  –  and other books

.

.

.

.

.

.

____________________

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Book Review

.

Churchill’s Secret Wars

.

Churchill Famine in India & Bangladesh, 1942

.

.

.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/churchills-secret-war-by-madhusree-mukerjee-2068698.html

.

.

.

By, Prof. Chandak Goopta

History Professor,

Birkbek College

Sep 3, 2010

.

C.Sengoopta@BBK.co.uk

.

.

.

http://www.bbk.ac.uk/history/our-staff/full-time-academic-staff/professor-chandak-sengoopta/professor-chandak-sengoopta

.

.

Ihave not become the King’s First Minister in order to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire,” Winston Churchill famously declared in 1942. That passion for empire did not, however, entail the duty of protecting the lives of the King’s distant subjects, especially Indians, “a beastly people with a beastly religion.” In 1943, as millions were dying of starvation in 1943 in Bengal, the birthplace of the Raj, Churchill not only refused to help but prevented others from doing so, commenting that Indians “bred like rabbits.” The Churchill industry, more interested in Winston Churchill’s dentures than in his Thousands of War Crimes, has managed to keep this appalling story fairly quiet.

.

Much has been written on the Bengal famine in India and America, but mostly concentrating on local factors. Madhusree Mukerjee’s Churchill’s Secret War, however, sets the disaster in its imperial context, showing how the story of the famine was interwoven with the history of Gandhi’s “Quit India” movement and the attitudes and priorities of Churchill and his war cabinet. It establishes how Churchill and his associates could easily have stopped the famine with a few shipments of foodgrains but refused, in spite of repeated appeals from two successive Viceroys, Churchill’s own Secretary of State for India and even the President of the United States.

.

Famines, never unknown in India, became increasingly lethal during the Raj because of the export of foodgrains and the replacement of food crops with indigo or jute. The Second World War made things worse, especially after Japanese forces occupied Burma in 1942, cutting off Indian rice imports. Then a destructive cyclone hit the Bengal coast just when the crucial winter crop was maturing and the surviving rice was damaged by disease. Officials of the Raj, fearing a Japanese invasion, confiscated everything that might help the invading force – boats, carts, motor vehicles, elephants and, crucially, all the rice available. The Japanese never came but a panicking public – and many crafty businessmen – immediately began to hoard rice and the staple food of the people quickly disappeared from the marketplace.

.

Government stocks were released but only to feed the people of Calcutta, especially British businesspeople and their employees, railway and port workers and government staff. Controlled shops were opened for less important Calcuttans and the urban population never suffered too greatly. The rural masses, however, were left to the wolves. This was when Churchill could have made a difference by sending wheat or rice to Bengal, and not enormous quantities. The point was to make hoarding unprofitable and as the Viceroy Lord Linlithgow pointed out, “the mere knowledge of impending imports” would have done so by lowering the price of rice.

.

Churchill and his war cabinet, however, decided to reserve available shipping to take food to Italy in case it fell to the Allies. Indian nationalist Subhas Chandra Bose, then fighting with Axis forces, offered to send rice from Burma but British censors did not even allow his offer to be reported. Australia and Canada were eager to send wheat but virtually all merchant ships plying in the Indian Ocean area had been moved to the Atlantic in order to bring food to Britain, which already had a comfortable stockpile.

.

So hundreds of thousands perished in the villages of Bengal and, by the middle of 1943, hordes of starving people were flooding into Calcutta, most dying on the streets, often in front of well-stocked shops or restaurants serving lavish meals. The very air of the metropolis, a journalist noted, was pervaded by that “distinctive sourish odour which the victims give off a few hours before the end.”

.

In London, Churchill’s beloved advisor, the physicist Frederick Alexander Lindemann (Lord Cherwell), was unmoved. A firm believer in Malthusian population theory, he blamed Indian philoprogenitiveness for the famine – sending more food would worsen the situation by encouraging Indians to breed more. The prime minister was of the same opinion and expressed himself so colourfully that Leo Amery, Secretary of State for India, exploded at him, comparing his attitudes to Hitler’s.

.

The Churchill industry has always denied that their idol could have done anything to relieve the Bengal famine. Shipping, they claim, was scarce and it just wasn’t possible to send food to Bengal. Mukerjee nails those “terminological inexactitudes” with precision. There was a shipping glut in summer and autumn 1943, thanks to the US transferring cargo ships to British control. Churchill, Lindemann and their close associates simply did not consider Indian lives worth saving.

.

Mukerjee has researched this forgotten holocaust with great care and forensic rigour. Mining an extensive range of sources, she not only sheds light on the imperial shenanigans around the famine, but on a host of related issues, such as the flowering of nationalism in famine-hit districts, Churchill’s fury about the sterling credit that India was piling up in London, or the dreadful situation in the villages even after the famine was technically over. Her calmly phrased but searing account of imperial brutality will shame admirers of the Greatest Briton and horrify just about everybody else.

.

.

.

.

Further Reading about

Churchill Famine :

.

.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Churchills-Secret-War-British-Forgotten/dp/0465002013

.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/churchills-secret-war-by-madhusree-mukerjee-2068698.html  —–  Reviewed by an Indian Historian, Chandak Sengoopta, Professor of History, Birkbeck College, Nazi London, Nazi Britain

.

http://reflectionsvvk.blogspot.de/2012/09/book-review-churchills-secret-war.html

.

http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/book-review-churchills-secret-war

.

https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/madhusree-mukerjee/churchills-secret-war/

.

http://bloggingheads.tv/videos/2734  —  VIDEO

.

http://www.flipkart.com/churchill-s-secret-war-9380658476/p/itmdf8avpueqkcmx

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Nazi Britain’s Global Legacy of Conflict

.

.

.

.

.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2012/09/04/259825/britains-global-legacy-of-conflict/

.

.

Sep 04, 2012

.

By, Finian Cunningham

.

It’s been a busy news week for British colonialism, or more accurately, the violent legacy of British colonialism. A rash of ongoing or renewed conflicts across the globe speaks of the detriment that the once-powerful British bequeathed and for which people of today have to contend with through injustice and in some cases immense human suffering.

In Northern Ireland, Belfast city has seen resurgent riots between pro-British Protestant youths and Irish nationalist Catholics, with extensive injuries, property damage and a painful reminder of sectarian bloodletting in recent years.

Over in the South Atlantic, Argentines and their government are up in arms over the London government’s proposal to hold a referendum on the future status of the Malvinas Islands, the British colony off Argentina otherwise known as the Falklands.

In the Middle East, Israel has committed yet more crimes against the besieged Palestinian people when fighter jets bombed the coastal Gaza strip, adding to the daily abject misery and terror of inhabitants.

Elsewhere in the Middle East, the people of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia continue their street agitations for democratic freedom from despotic monarchial rulers. In Bahrain, the calls for democracy were given added impetus when a court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders, some of whom have been imprisoned for life.

Further East on the atlas, in the military junta of Myanmar, formerly known as British Burma, the persecution of thousands of Rohingya Muslims continues unabated, with hundreds killed at the hands of Buddhist gangs after being burned out of their shanty homes.

In each of these seemingly disparate conflicts, the seeds of violence were sown by one system – British colonialism and its malevolent engineering of sectarianism. It is an indictment of British rulers that decades on, and sometimes centuries on, people’s lives are still being blighted by the legacy of Britain’s predatory, criminal history.

In Northern Ireland, a peace settlement was reached after nearly 30 years of an anti-imperialist war between the guerrilla Irish Republican Army and the British forces. More than 3,000 people were killed during that conflict, which British government counter-insurgency policy succeeded in distorting into a sectarian bloodbath between pro-British Protestant loyalists and the mainly Catholic Irish nationalist population. The origins of that conflict lay in the gerrymandering of Ireland by the British colonial rulers when they partitioned the island in 1920-21 – against international and democratic norms – into a pro-British northern statelet and a nominally independent southern state.

The British colonial rulers inculcated a supremacist mindset among the Protestant community in the new Northern Ireland, copperfastening the privileged misrule with political, economic and social discrimination against Catholics. Many Protestant working-class communities were in truth not much better off materially than their Catholic counterparts, but nevertheless British sectarian policy implanted deep seeds of hatred and distrust as a means of dividing and ruling.

The latest outbreak of rioting in Belfast was sparked when Catholics tried to hold a peaceful commemorative march at the weekend. Sections within the Protestant community could not tolerate such a demonstration, even though the 1998 peace accord supposedly guarantees religious and cultural equality in Northern Ireland. The mindset of sectarian hatred inherited from British colonial subjugation of Irish national rights is still a live issue. Politicians in London may tut-tut at the street mayhem in Belfast, but this is a manifestation of Britain’s illegitimate meddling in Ireland.

British involvement in Ireland accrues from a self-styled mandate that stems from the historical implantation of a pro-British citizenry. The same gerrymandering to thwart natural territorial rights can be seen in the ongoing dispute over the Malvinas Islands, which were forcibly dispossessed from Argentina by Britain in 1833 and renamed the Falklands Islands. The two countries went to war briefly in 1982 after Argentinian troops occupied the territory. Argentina has substantial territorial claims to the islands off its coast, however Britain maintains that it has legal right to possession because the islanders, who descend from British colonizers, insist that they want to retain British status. This is classic British subjective gerrymandering to “get the right result”.

The British government continues to rankle Buenos Aires because it refuses to comply with United Nations resolutions to enter into a negotiated settlement. The latest move by British Prime Minister David Cameron to hold a referendum in the Malvinas on the future of the islands has been denounced by Argentina as a further British obstacle to resolving the dispute. Given the huge oil and fishing resources around the territory, and the recent militarization of the area by the British, the risk of a resumption of war cannot be discounted.

A different kind of British social engineering for colonial expedience is seen in today’s plight of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims. These people were introduced by the British rulers of Burma and imperial India. The Rohingyas were transplanted from what became Bangladesh to the Southeast Asian British colony of Burma to serve as labourers and servants for their white masters. Although the Muslim Rohingyas have now lived in Myanmar for generations, they have never been accepted by the indigenous majority Buddhists, and they have endured decades of brutal persecution. This persecution has escalated recently with massacres and burning of villages and shanty towns. One possible factor is that following an official visit to Myanmar by British Prime Minister Cameron earlier this year, the ruling junta may feel they have gained the favour of the Western powers, who are eager to open up trade and investment, and thus are emboldened to resume their genocidal policy against the Rohingyas. Sacrificed in the past to do menial work for their British masters, these people are being sacrificed again as pawns for British capital.

The legacy of British misrule and exploitation spans the globe, but its centerpiece for bequeathed suffering must be the Middle East region. Today, the people of Palestine live as strangers in their own land, dispossessed of their rights and their homes to live in the world’s biggest open-air concentration camp. This week saw Israeli warplanes bomb the impoverished Palestinians living under rubble and makeshift houses in Gaza. In truth, this is not news. Such crimes against humanity occur on a weekly basis in the Zionist-occupied Palestinian land, thanks in part to British political support, as well as American and European.

A look at historical maps of the Holy Land shows an inversion of politics and demographics between 1947 and today. In 1947, there was no state of Israel. British-controlled Palestine was a unitary territory predominated with Palestinian Muslims, as well as minorities of Christians and Jews. But the British rulers seduced by Jewish capitalists arrogated the right to deliver on the secretive Balfour Declaration of 1917 and hand over the territory to Zionists led by Chaim Weizmann and Ben Gurion. Today, the Palestinians are reduced to subsist on two diminishing territorial enclaves crucified by walls and checkpoints, their homes demolished and bombed at will by American-supplied Israeli warplanes and drones.

In the Persian Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, the majority of people struggle to win democratic freedoms from the British imposition of despotic rulers. The Houses of Saud and Khalifa were grafted on to the majority Arab people by the House of Windsor to function as imperialist constructs to deliver oil wealth. These despotic rulers defy all norms of democracy and human rights thanks to the protection of British and American military might. The ongoing popular protests against these absolute monarchies in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, and the silence from London and Washington, demonstrates the legacy of British misrule that these people are having to suffer in the present day. It also demonstrates the rank hypocrisy and cynicism of these powers and their Arab despots who claim to be supporting democracy and human rights in Syria.

This week, a Bahraini court upheld the sentences against 20 political leaders and human rights activists whose only “crime” was to peacefully call for elected government to replace the British-imposed and US-supported Khalifa absolute dictator. The political leaders include figures like Hasan Mushaima and Ebrahim Sharif; the human rights activists include Abdulhadi Al Khawaja and Abduljalil Al Singace. These are men of integrity and noble conscience. All were brutalized, tortured, illegally detained and forced to make trumped-up confessions.

Meanwhile, the British-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed that the Bahraini king, Hamad Al Khalifa, donated $4.7 million dollars to the British military academy Sandhurst – the academy that has functioned as a supplier of British militarism to the world over the centuries.

The above is only a snapshot of the ongoing legacy of British misrule across the planet. At the height of the British Empire, in the early 20th century, it is reckoned that Britain asserted domination over some 20 per cent of the Earth’s landmass. Many more painful legacies could therefore be added to the litany of violence and suffering that so many people have to live with today.

The point is not to revisit history as some distant, past event. The point is to understand the seeds of conflict in today’s world so that some attempt can be made at creating a solution from an accurate understanding of the root causes of conflict.

A further point is to accurately assess the moral and political bankruptcy of Britain’s rulers in present world conflicts. When the British government pokes its moralizing finger at Iran or into the sovereign affairs of Syria, it should be seen as not only illegitimate, but as the bearer of conflict, suffering and destruction. The British government should be seen as having no positive role to play in resolving any conflict. Indeed, if it gets its covert way in Syria, the British involvement there will result in a hateful sectarian bloodbath, in much the same way that it has overseen in Libya along with its American, French and Arab despotic allies.

Britain may once upon a time have ruled the waves. Today, its mischief-making rulers should be waved away with contempt.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.